September 14, 2011

 
“They must not have liked my hair.”

For those of you who don’t know me personally, I’m not only the online dating guru, but I’m also a singer/actor. And that line above is what I say when I don’t get the part. Their loss!

What does this have to do with dating? Well, when we put ourselves out there by sending people e-mails on an online dating site, we risk the chance of not getting an e-mail back. But let me be clear: Non-response does not equal rejection. In other words, the absence of a positive reply (an e-mail back) is not the same as someone turning you down. As OkCupid confirms, on average, only 32% of first messages sent ever receive responses.

There’s good reason not to treat the lack of a response as a rejection. Who knows why people don’t respond? The why isn’t the important part because it’s often out of our control. Maybe you look like an ex, maybe he dismissed you for having one silly typo, maybe she had a business trip that week and didn’t get to check her Match.com account. Whatever the reason, just chalk it up to, “They must not have liked my hair.”

True, the lack of response makes it that much harder to deal with when you fall in love with someone’s profile and think you’re destined to be together, right? A guy I know (we’ll call him Joey) came across a girl online who was also an avid golfer, loved cookie dough ice cream, and thought that doing the New York Times crossword puzzle was the best thing since sliced bread. He was obsessed with her profile and asked me to help write her an e-mail to win her over. I did. But I warned him that should she not respond, they weren’t meant to be, and that was that. He’d likely find a butter pecan-loving woman who much preferred Sudoku, and they’d be just as compatible because she’d expand his horizons. Until someone responds, he or she can’t be the love of your life (and for poor Joey, she wasn’t) – you’re lusting over some words and a picture on a screen. It’s only when you get a response that the person becomes real. And for that reason, I recommend sending more e-mails to more people than you’re inclined to because, ultimately, it’s a numbers game. The more e-mails you send, the more responses you get. 32% of 20 is more than 32% of 10, right? And who doesn’t want responses?

Is your next question, “Are you telling me to e-mail people I’m just ‘meh’ about in order to get a response?” Sort of, yes. As we all know, most of us are better in person than we are on paper (c’mon – we all know it’s true), so if you’re even somewhat interested in someone online, go for the e-mail. I’m a fan of opening all possible doors (sending e-mails) and then closing them later (after some e-mailing back-and-forth or after a date) if the person is ultimately not what you want. But in the end, the right ones will respond because you each see something promising in each other.

So, feel free to send those e-mails. What’s the worst that could happen… you don’t get a response? No biggie! They just didn’t like your hair.

Want more dating advice? (You know you do!) Click Here for your very own dating cheat sheet of 25 secret dating tips you can use immediately.

They Must Not Have Liked My Hair

12 thoughts on “They Must Not Have Liked My Hair

  • September 14, 2011 at 8:16 pm
    Permalink

    Erika, I really enjoy these articles. You’re such a talented writer and I think you do give great advice. I especially like your point that 32% of 20 is greater than 32% of 10. It’s simple math but people often get so caught up in the emotions of rejection they forget the numbers game that you must play to be successful at online dating — or as I prefer to call it: online meeting. The dating is offline!

    Reply
  • Pingback:Online Dating Tips For Men | WhoIsDatingWho.net

  • Pingback:Online Dating Tips For Men | FACEBOOK FOR DATING

  • Pingback:Online Dating Tips For Men | Singles For Dating

  • Pingback:Online Dating Tips For Men | aboutstockexchange.com

  • December 5, 2012 at 9:18 pm
    Permalink

    You know I am so frustrated with online dating. I’ve spent countless hours perfecting my profile and have sent somewhere around 50 messages. Guess what? I got one response from a transexual and another from a girl who called me ugly. I like to think of myself as a very attractive guy too. So that is what? 4% success rate at getting a response with no guarantee it will be positive?

    Reply
    • December 29, 2014 at 12:27 pm
      Permalink

      Yeah man, my response rate has been about the same from women and I’ve sent almost 100 messages. I guess that making fun of myself, or the dating site, or making bold statements about my attractiveness has been what has worked best so far. The responses have either been neutral or positive, the few that I have gotten. It’s exceptionally frustrating when I feel that i kind of fumbled these opportunities away, most recently when I got gunshy with a girl who was much more forward than the rest.

      Reply
      • December 29, 2014 at 4:26 pm
        Permalink

        I just read an article saying that leading with Hi, Hey, or Hello has a drastic negative affect on response rate. That’s what I have been leading with on most of my messages.

        Reply
        • December 30, 2014 at 1:09 am
          Permalink

          That was from a study from OkCupid in 2011, when their average age user was 24. I’d take it with a grain of salt. You could just forgo the lead-in and just start the email with content as well. Best of luck!

          Reply
          • January 2, 2015 at 7:30 pm
            Permalink

            Forgoing a lead-in when messaging a person I have never met before seems to defy the basic principles of decorum, something I used to think one should show when dating (or in my case attempting to date, ha).

  • February 21, 2014 at 3:37 pm
    Permalink

    “Non-response does not equal rejection” is a great way to word it. I find many women, when busy, simply cannot read all their messages. You can always message back in a few weeks

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *